Peer Review Policy

Peer Review Policy for Blockchain, Web3 & Digital Trust Journal (GalaxiaUniverse):

• The journal uses a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and relevance of published research.

• Manuscripts undergo initial editorial screening for scope, quality, and ethical compliance before being sent out for review.

• Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent experts with relevant expertise in blockchain, Web3, and digital trust.

• The review is typically double-blind, keeping both authors and reviewers anonymous to minimize bias.

• Reviewers evaluate submissions based on originality, methodological rigor, clarity, ethical considerations, and scientific contribution.

• Reviewers provide constructive feedback and recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection.

• The editorial team considers reviewer comments and makes the final publication decision.

• Conflicts of interest must be declared by reviewers and handled appropriately by editors.

• The journal follows ethical guidelines and best practices, including those recommended by COPE, for managing peer review and ethical concerns.

• The review process is designed to be timely and transparent, giving authors opportunities to respond to reviewers' comments.

This policy supports the journal’s commitment to academic integrity, rigor, and advancing knowledge in the evolving domains of blockchain technology, Web3, and digital trust.