Peer Review Policy

Peer Review Policy for Journal of Ethics in Emerging Technologies & Society (JEETS):

  • JEETS employs a double-blind peer review process to ensure unbiased and rigorous evaluation of manuscripts, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous.

  • Manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to check for alignment with the journal’s scope, originality, and ethical compliance before being sent to reviewers.

  • Each submission is typically reviewed by at least two independent experts with relevant subject matter expertise.

  • Reviewers assess the quality, originality, methodology, ethical considerations, clarity, and relevance of the manuscript.

  • Reviewers provide constructive feedback and recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection.

  • Editors consider reviewers’ recommendations and make the final decision regarding publication.

  • Conflicts of interest must be declared by reviewers and editors; those with conflicts are recused from the review process.

  • The review process aims to be timely and transparent, with opportunities for authors to respond to reviewers' comments.

  • The journal follows COPE guidelines for handling ethical issues identified during peer review.

  • Appeals against editorial decisions can be made, but the final decision rests with the editorial board.

The peer review policy upholds the scholarly integrity and quality standards essential for publishing ethical and impactful research on emerging technologies.

If more details on the review timeline, reviewer roles, or appeals process are needed, please ask!The Journal of Ethics in Emerging Technologies & Society employs a double-blind peer review process, ensuring anonymity for both authors and reviewers. Manuscripts are initially screened by editors for scope and originality before being sent to at least two independent experts for evaluation based on quality, methodology, ethical considerations, and relevance. Reviewers provide constructive feedback and recommendations on acceptance, revision, or rejection. Editors make final publication decisions, adhering to COPE guidelines to manage ethical issues in the review process. Conflicts of interest are disclosed, and appeals against decisions can be made but rest with the editorial board. This policy maintains rigorous and unbiased assessment to ensure high-quality scholarly standards.