Corrections and Retractions Policy

Digital Health & Telemonitoring Advances (DHTA) is committed to maintaining the accuracy, reliability, and integrity of the published scholarly record. The journal recognizes that published articles may occasionally require amendments when errors, inaccuracies, ethical concerns, or issues affecting research reliability are identified after publication.

This policy describes the procedures followed by the journal for managing corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions in a transparent and responsible manner.

1. Purpose of Corrections and Retractions

The purpose of post-publication actions is to ensure that readers have access to accurate and reliable scholarly information while maintaining transparency regarding changes made to published content.

The journal may issue corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions depending on the nature and severity of the identified issue.

2. Corrections

A correction may be issued when a published article contains an error that affects the accuracy, interpretation, or understanding of the work but does not invalidate the overall findings or conclusions.

Corrections may address issues such as:

  • Minor errors in text, tables, figures, or author information.

  • Incorrect but non-critical publication details.

  • Errors that require clarification for accurate interpretation.

Corrections are linked to the original article whenever possible, and the correction notice clearly describes the changes made.

3. Expressions of Concern

An expression of concern may be published when there are significant questions regarding the reliability, ethics, or validity of a published article, but the investigation process has not yet reached a final conclusion.

Situations that may require an expression of concern include:

  • Ongoing investigations of possible research misconduct.

  • Serious concerns regarding data reliability.

  • Unresolved ethical issues related to research conduct.

The journal may update the record when additional information becomes available.

4. Retractions

Retraction is a mechanism used to correct the scholarly record when a published article contains serious problems that affect the reliability or integrity of the research.

Articles may be considered for retraction in cases involving:

  • Confirmed research misconduct.

  • Fabricated or falsified data.

  • Significant plagiarism.

  • Duplicate or redundant publication.

  • Serious ethical violations.

  • Major errors that invalidate the findings or conclusions.

A retraction notice will provide clear information about the reason for retraction while maintaining transparency for readers.

5. Retraction Process

When a possible need for retraction is identified, the journal follows an appropriate assessment process.

The process may include:

  1. Evaluation of the concern by the editorial team.

  2. Communication with the authors for clarification.

  3. Review of available evidence and relevant documentation.

  4. Consultation with experts or institutions when required.

  5. Editorial decision regarding appropriate action.

The journal aims to ensure that decisions are fair, evidence-based, and consistent with responsible publishing practices.

6. Post-Publication Ethical Concerns

Concerns regarding published articles may be raised by:

  • Authors.

  • Reviewers.

  • Readers.

  • Researchers.

  • Institutions or organizations.

The journal welcomes responsible communication regarding potential errors or ethical concerns and evaluates all legitimate concerns carefully.

7. Maintaining the Published Record

When corrections or retractions are issued:

  • The original article record is maintained where appropriate.

  • Notices are clearly linked to the affected publication.

  • The reason for the editorial action is explained.

  • The integrity of the scholarly record is preserved.

The journal does not remove published articles without appropriate justification and editorial consideration.

8. Author Responsibilities After Publication

Authors are expected to:

  • Inform the journal promptly if significant errors are discovered in their published work.

  • Cooperate with editorial investigations.

  • Provide necessary explanations or supporting information.

  • Participate in correction or retraction procedures when required.

9. Editorial Responsibility

The editorial team of Digital Health & Telemonitoring Advances is responsible for ensuring that post-publication decisions are handled objectively, transparently, and according to ethical publishing principles.

Editors evaluate each case individually and take appropriate action to protect the reliability of the scientific record.

10. Commitment to Scholarly Integrity

Digital Health & Telemonitoring Advances is committed to responsible publishing practices and maintaining trust in academic communication. Through transparent correction and retraction procedures, the journal supports accurate reporting, ethical research practices, and the long-term reliability of published knowledge.