Explainable Deep Learning Models for High-Stakes Decision Systems

Authors

  • Pierre Nowak Research Scientist, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Western Europe Data Science University, Madrid, Spain Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Keywords:

explainable AI, deep learning, interpretability, SHAP, LIME, Integrated Gradients, GradCAM, high-stakes AI, EU AI Act, transparency

Abstract

Deep learning models have achieved state-of-the-art predictive performance across a broad range of high-stakes decision domains -- including clinical diagnosis, credit scoring, recidivism prediction, and autonomous vehicle control -- yet their intrinsic opacity remains a fundamental barrier to deployment in regulated and accountability-sensitive contexts. Explainability, broadly defined as the capacity of a model to produce human-interpretable accounts of its predictions, is now a legal requirement under the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (2024) and the General Data Protection Regulation for AI systems making decisions with significant effects on individuals. This paper presents a systematic comparative evaluation of six explainability methods applied to deep learning models across three high-stakes domains: clinical image classification (chest X-ray pathology detection), tabular credit risk scoring, and natural language processing (NLP)-based legal document classification. A total of 18 deep learning model-explainer combinations (six explainers applied to three domain models) are evaluated using a four-dimensional explainability quality framework comprising fidelity, comprehensibility, stability, and actionability. Quantitative results demonstrate substantial variation in explainability quality across methods and domains: gradient-based methods (Integrated Gradients, GradCAM) achieve the highest fidelity scores in image domains (mean fidelity = 0.84, SD = 0.06) but poor stability in NLP contexts (mean stability = 0.51, SD = 0.09). Perturbation-based methods (SHAP, LIME) achieve higher comprehensibility and stability across domains (mean = 0.79, SD = 0.07) but lower fidelity in complex image tasks (mean = 0.67, SD = 0.10). The study contributes a domain-stratified explainability benchmark, a practitioner selection guide mapping explainer methods to domain requirements, and empirical guidance for EU AI Act Article 13 transparency compliance in deep learning systems.

Author Biography

  • Pierre Nowak, Research Scientist, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Western Europe Data Science University, Madrid, Spain

    Research Scientist, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Western Europe Data Science University, Madrid, Spain

Downloads

Published

2024-03-20

How to Cite

Explainable Deep Learning Models for High-Stakes Decision Systems. (2024). AI Governance and Society Journal P-ISSN 3117-6097 and E-ISSN 3117-6100, 1(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.5281/