Peer Review Policy

Peer Review Policy for Journal of Digital Learning Futures

The Journal of Digital Learning Futures employs a rigorous double-anonymized (double-blind) peer review process to ensure the quality, integrity, and impartiality of published research.

Key Features:

• Double-Blind Review: Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process to prevent bias.

• Initial Editorial Screening: Submissions undergo a preliminary check for scope and guideline compliance before peer review.

• Expert Reviewers: Manuscripts are evaluated by at least two independent experts with relevant expertise to provide objective assessments.

• Evaluation Criteria: Reviewers assess originality, methodological rigor, significance, clarity, and ethical compliance.

• Review Outcome: Reviewers provide detailed feedback and recommendations (accept, revise, or reject).

• Final Decision: The Editorial Board makes final publication decisions based on reviewers’ comments and overall manuscript quality.

• Conflicts of Interest: Reviewers and editors must disclose any conflicts and recuse themselves as necessary.

• Timeliness: The journal aims for an efficient review process to enable timely publication.

• Appeals: Authors may appeal editorial decisions following established procedures, with the final decision resting with the editorial team.

The peer review process helps maintain the high scholarly standards of the journal while supporting authors in improving their work.